Planning Committee - Live broadcast to start on the rising of Licensing Committee and available for repeat viewing.   

Apologies were received from Cllr Tanner and Cllr Mrs Pearson was

substitute and Cllr Dr Barrett and Cllr Barrett was substitute.

The Minutes of the Planning and Licensing Committee held on 15^th March 2022 were agreed as a true record.

This application has been referred to the Planning Committee by Cllr Gareth Barrett for the following reason:

The proposal proposes an inconsistent density with the property in the local area, new velux style windows create overlooking and a reduction in privacy, and while without clear measurements on the plans available this is not easy to confirm, appears it is not in line with the gross internal area standards for a nine bedroom property (in terms of floor space across the site, in multiple rooms and height in the 2nd floor rooms).

Mrs Sargeant presented the report to the committee.

The chair read out a statement on behalf of Mr & Mrs Ludwig in objection to the application.

As a very close resident (1 Primrose Hill), to the said property (53 Crown Street), my husband and I have grave concerns of a 9 bedroom HMO opening on our doorstep.  The property in question was set up some time ago (by previous owners) as a unlicensed HMO and we suffered lots of disturbance, noise pollution and excessive rubbish waste behind our garden.  The amount of bedrooms squeezed into the new developed property seems questionable and far too many occupants compared to surrounding properties.  The owner has also added two 'new' windows to the side of the property which directly overlook our garden and living areas.  Thankfully this was picked up as unauthorised development. 

However,  the windows are still in place and causing us concerns for our privacy.  We have a young son who is often playing in the garden and previously had to be subjected to groups from the property hanging around in the car park using foul language and smoking illegal substances.

The developer for this application has already built a large development in front of our property (Primrose Mews) and is now planning to house another 9+ residents behind us.  It all seems very excessive considering how many other developments we have going on in the area?

We have lived in our property for 15 years and considerate it our family home. We feel an HMO on our doorstep would compromise our privacy and wellbeing.

The chair read out a statement from the agent on behalf of the applicant  in support of  the application.

The application before you seeks to resurrect the use of 53 Crown Street as a house of multiple occupancy providing accommodation of high-specification that meets all planning and licensing policies for use as a HMO. Including bike stands, bin store and parking spaces in excess of the required minimum standards. 

As the existing and proposed elevations demonstrate and in accordance with the planning officers request, the amendment to the side elevation has been limited to the removal of 1 window and the enlargement of 1 window at ground level. There are no further changes to the building’s fenestration.  

Historically, 53 Crown Street was licensed (BRW/HMO/021) as an HMO of 9 dwellings from January 2014 with a licence renewal date of January 2019. The property currently has  ...  view the full minutes text for item 56.

This application is presented to Committee for determination as it has been referred by Cllr Olivia Sanders (Francois) for the following reason: 

Havering Grove Farm is a farmstead with a mixture of buildings. Due to cessation of these storage buildings a proposed development of four residential units is proposed.

These buildings will be constructed on the current hard standing therefore the green belt will not be harmed. It will vastly improve the appearance of the site given what is there currently.  The associated landscaping will also help to enhance the area.  As this proposal will see homes built instead of commercial storage, there will be a reduction in traffic movements on this small section of Rayleigh Road which will definitely be of benefit to the residents who live either side of the farm.

Mrs Sargeant presented the report to the committee.

Cllr Sanders (Francois) Ward Councillor, spoke in support of the application.

Members expressed that this application would improve the site as it is at present and that residents are in support of the application.  Discussion was had in relation to very special circumstances for allowing inappropriate development in the Green Belt.  It was considered that very special circumstances exist in this case as the proposal would enhance the landscape, visual amenity and biodiversity, as well as improving damaged and derelict land.

Following a full discussion, Cllr Parker  MOVED and Cllr Barber SECONDED

that the application be APPROVED.

A vote was taken, and Members voted as follows:

FOR: Cllrs Barber, Bridge, Jakobsson, Parker, Mrs Pearson and Wiles (6)

AGAINST: Cllrs Barrett, M Cuthbert, Mrs Gelderbloem, Fryd, Laplain, Mynott (6)

ABSTAIN:  (0)

The Chair used his casting vote, and the application was RESOLVED subject to the conditions:

Draft conditions have been sent to the Chair and Vice Chair and are copied below (please note these are still subject to agreement):

1.    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration ofthree years from the date of this permission.

Reason: To comply with Section   91(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 ofthe Planningand Compulsory PurchaseAct 2004.

2.    The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete                                                accordance with the approved drawing(s) and documents listed above.

Reason: Toensure thatthe developmentis aspermitted bythe localplanning          authority.

3.    No development shall take place, including any ground works or demolition,until a Construction Environment Method Plan has been submitted to, and approved inwriting by, the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be adhered to  throughout the construction period. The Plan shall provide for:

i.              the parking of  vehicles of site operatives and visitors

ii.            a waste management plan

iii.           details of measures to minimise noise and vibration during construction and demolition

iv.           measures to control the emission of dust and dirt during construction

v.            route to be used by construction vehicles  to and from the site

vi.           loading and unloading  ...  view the full minutes text for item 57.

The application is reported to the Planning Committee as referred by Councillor Thomas Heard for the following reason:

Last July, plans were approved for an extension at 9 Sebastian Avenue. Building work started in the Autumn and is continuing. At the time of the original approval residents in neighbouring properties identified to the Planning department that they believed the approved plans were flawed in that they were inaccurate and confusing.

There have been many issues of concern since building started, not least that some of the building work was in breach of the original plans (enforcement have been involved). There have been 14 revised plans submitted. Neighbours have been in lengthy communication with Brentwood Planning concerning, amongst other things, the inaccuracy of plan measurements and accompanying statements and establishing a clear view of what it is we are supposed to be reviewing as neighbours.

Miss Pride presented the report to the committee.

Mr Jenkins was present and address the committee in objection to the application.

MrMaitana, the applicant was also present and address the committee in support of the application.

Cllr Fryd, Ward Councillor, spoke about his concerns relating to the application process.

Concerns were expressed by members in regarding to the number of alternatives drawings that were submitted by the applicant. 

Following a full discussion, Cllr Parker MOVED and Cllr Wiles SECONDED that the application be APPROVED.

A vote was taken, and Members voted as follows:

FOR: Cllrs Barrett, Barber, Bridge, Mrs Gelderbloem, Jakobsson, Parker, Mrs Pearson and Wiles (8)

AGAINST: (0)

ABSTAIN:  Cllrs M Cuthbert, Fryd, Laplain and Mynott (4)

The motion to APPROVE the application was RESOLVED subject to the conditions below:

1     DRA01A Development in accordance with drawings

The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved documents listed above and specifications.

Reason:  To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.

2     U0046541         

This permission only relates to the variation of condition 2 of the permission granted under reference 21/00645/HHA and all other conditions, i.e. conditions 1, and 3 to 5, of that permission shall continue to apply in full unless otherwise discharged.

Reason: To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.

Informative(s)

1   INF04

The permitted development must be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings and specification.  If you wish to amend your proposal you will need formal permission from the Council.  The method of obtaining permission depends on the nature of the amendment and you are advised to refer to the Council’s web site or take professional advice before making your application.

2   INF05

The following development plan policies contained in the Brentwood Local Plan 2016-2033 are relevant to this decision: BE14 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG).

3   INF22

The Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in determining this  ...  view the full minutes text for item 58.

The application is reported to the Planning Committee as it has been referred at the request of the Parish Council for the following reasons:

The site has been granted the construction of 3 substantial houses in the past two years now potentially 4 more and their associated parking spaces in this application, with the prospect of more plans for housing put forward as other farm buildings exist on other parts of the farm.

The road the site lies off of is a rat run suffering from speeding issues and the introduction of more houses and vehicles will only add to impact on ill maintained country lanes of the Parish.

There is no public transport.

The design is not in keeping of the area.

The site is neither brownfield nor infill and does not form part of the LDP.

The site is nearby to the growing development of illegal travellers site.

The Parish Council and residents consider it is over development in the greenbelt impacting on its openness and loss of greenbelt

Miss Pride was present at the meeting and presented the report.

Mr Halladay, Agent, spoke on behalf of the Applicant.

Cllr Mrs Gelderbloem, spoke in support of the concerns expressed by the Parish Council.

(Cllr Mrs Gelderbloem declared an non pecuniary interest)

Cllr Parker MOVED and Cllr Mrs Pearson SECONDED that the application be APPROVED.

A vote was taken, and Members voted as follows:

FOR: Cllrs Barber, Bridge, M Cuthbert, Fryd, Jakobsson, Laplain, Mynott, Parker, Mrs Pearson and Wiles (10)

AGAINST: Cllr Mrs Gelderbloem (1)

ABSTAIN: Cllr Barrett (1)

The motion to APPROVE the application was RESOLVED subject to the conditions below:

1          TIM01 Standard Time - Full

The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason:  To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

2          DRA01A        Development in accordance with drawings

The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved drawing(s) listed above and specifications.

Reason:  To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.

3          MAT01           Samples (details acceptable)

No development shall take place until details of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the building hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.  Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason:  In Order to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.

4          BOU01           Boundary treatment to be agreed (general)

The development shall not be occupied until details of the treatment of all boundaries including drawings of any gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.  The approved boundary treatments shall be completed prior to the first occupation of the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 59.

This report provided members with information regarding recent planning appeal decisions. Mr Drane presented the report, which was to note. Members thanked officers on the work undertaken on appeals.

There were no items of urgent business.

                                                                        The meeting concluded at 21.18